Entire Big Tech Company Fired for Cheering Trump Assassin Online
"It was worth every word and I stand by my statement," said defiant software engineer Taylor Atticus.
San Francisco, CA - In an unprecedented and utterly bizarre turn of events, the entire staff of CensorSphere—a Silicone Valley-based social media platform notoriously known for its iron-fisted control over online speech—has been fired for publicly cheering on the failed assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. The incident has led to the company's implosion, leaving some calling it "Cancel Culture" and others laughing hysterically.
CensorSphere, a big-tech giant that ironically claims to be a bastion of free speech while secretly squashing dissent, found itself at the center of controversy after the assassination attempt. As news of the incident broke, every single employee, all 67,317 took to their own accounts, expressing unbridled enthusiasm for the failed attack. Posts included everything from gleeful memes to outright lamentations over the shooter's poor aim. Some speculated Trump staged the whole thing for publicity, while they hadn't had a critical, skeptical thought about anything else in years.
It wasn't long before conservative watchdog accounts like LeftysGoneWild caught wind of the situation. The account exposed the disturbing comments, sparking a massive backlash from the public and political figures across the spectrum. Calls for accountability rang out, with many questioning whether CensorSphere's employees had crossed a line.
In a dramatic response, CensorSphere's CEO, Mark Phuckerderg, took to a company-wide Zoom call to announce the immediate termination of every single employee, including himself. "We have always been champions of free expression," Phuckerderg declared with a nod and a wink, "but cheering an assassination attempt, even a failed one, goes beyond the pale. It compromises our core values and damages our image. Therefore, I have decided to cancel everyone, starting with yours truly."
As CensorSphere crumbled, a faction of the fired employees quickly regrouped to launch a new venture, "FreedomFence." Promising to be a true "idea filtration system," the new platform is already being scrutinized for potentially replicating the same censorship policies that doomed its predecessor. In fact, early promotional material hints at strict moderation rules against "extremist, bigoted views" like understanding basic biology, history and statistics.
The debacle has reignited the age-old debate over the limits of free speech. While cheering an assassination attempt is undeniably extreme and potentially harmful, it raises critical questions about the extent to which such expressions should be tolerated or censored. And is there a distinction between cheering violence and calling for more? Are these legitimate forms of expression or do they constitute a threat that society must condemn to the point of firing the offending posters? What are your thoughts on the matter? Protected speech or a line that must not be crossed? Let us know in the comments below!
New milestone - we just hit 500 subscribers! Thanks for joining us. Please consider a $5 monthly subscription or a donation to support our work.
All good satire requires a thread of reality to run through it....well done. Personally, I believe all speech should be protected, regardless. You just point out the hypocrisy and hate involved which exposes the speaker for what they really are. Their opinions become irrelevant and they cancel themselves.
I especially liked the part where the CEO fired himself.